- The court supported the position of the tax authorities regarding the legality of increasing the amount of VAT liability
- The conclusions of the tax authority were based on financial transactions aimed at forming a tax credit without actually carrying out the transactions
- The court found that the documents provided by the plaintiff did not confirm the execution of work or delivery of goods, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff’s appeal
- The Cassation Administrative Court rejected the plaintiff’s appeal and upheld the decisions of the lower courts from 2017 and 2018
Source: od.tax.gov.ua
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Ukraine"
- VAT Registration in 2026: Deadlines and Effective Date Determination
- VAT Credit on Commission Import: When It Arises
- Fixed Asset Use Change in 2026: When VAT Liabilities Arise Under Article 199
- VAT Exemption for Defense Goods Applies Regardless of Funding Source
- SAF-T UA Without Errors: Practical Guidance for File Preparation and Submission
