- The court supported the position of the tax authorities regarding the legality of increasing the amount of VAT liability
- The conclusions of the tax authority were based on financial transactions aimed at forming a tax credit without actually carrying out the transactions
- The court found that the documents provided by the plaintiff did not confirm the execution of work or delivery of goods, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff’s appeal
- The Cassation Administrative Court rejected the plaintiff’s appeal and upheld the decisions of the lower courts from 2017 and 2018
Source: od.tax.gov.ua
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Ukraine"
- Number of Risky VAT Payers in Ukraine as of March 2026: Official Statistics from the Tax Service
- Kyiv ESBU Recovers 5.7 Million UAH in VAT Evasion Case, Ensures Full Restitution to State
- When Are Ukrainian-Language Audiobooks Exempt from VAT, Including Digital Formats?
- VAT Taxation Rules for Sale of Non-Residential Property with Land in Ukraine
- Date for VAT Credit Recognition: Which Event Determines the Tax Credit Date in Ukraine?
