- The court supported the position of the tax authorities regarding the legality of increasing the amount of VAT liability
- The conclusions of the tax authority were based on financial transactions aimed at forming a tax credit without actually carrying out the transactions
- The court found that the documents provided by the plaintiff did not confirm the execution of work or delivery of goods, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff’s appeal
- The Cassation Administrative Court rejected the plaintiff’s appeal and upheld the decisions of the lower courts from 2017 and 2018
Source: od.tax.gov.ua
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Ukraine"
- Green Electricity Surplus Sales and VAT Consequences in 2026
- Ukraine Passes VAT Reform for E-Commerce and Cross-Border Parcels
- Kyiv Tax Service and APTU Hold Webinar on ZED Payments and VAT Refunds
- Ukraine Exempts Ground Robotic Systems from VAT for Defense Needs
- Electronic Delivery Notes and VAT in 2026: Tax Credit Rights Explained














