- First-tier Tribunal ruled no supply for consideration or deemed supply to policyholders for black box devices
- Upper Tax Tribunal agreed there was no supply of goods when devices were fitted
- UT saw a supply of services for installation, but payment required for taxable supply
- WTGIL did not receive payment for installation, therefore no supply for VAT purposes
- Importance of reviewing commercial and contractual arrangements for VAT position
- Lack of direct connection between provision of devices, installation, and consideration crucial point in decision
Source: saffery.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- FINTUA Global VAT Guide for September 2025
- UK Supreme Court Rules VAT Applicable on Success Fees After Exit from VAT Group
- JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v HMRC: VAT Dispute on Intra-group Service Taxability, Appeal Dismissed
- UK Considers VAT Cut on Domestic Fuel: Targeted Relief or Broad Measure?
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Grouping and Time of Supply Rules in Prudential Assurance Case
