- Nakd and Organix bars were under scrutiny for their classification as “confectionery”
- The First-tier Tribunal initially classified the bars as confectionery in 2021
- The Upper Tribunal later ruled that healthiness of the products and ingredients should be considered
- The FTT ultimately decided that the look, feel, and taste of the bars were the most important indicators
- Other factors considered included ingredients, production process, and circumstances of consumption
- The FTT reaffirmed that the bars were confectionery and dismissed Morrisons’ appeal
Source: taxscape.deloitte.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK VAT Rules on Online Prize Draws Face Scrutiny Amid New Voluntary Code and Industry Growth
- How UK Businesses Accidentally Trigger US State Sales Tax Through Ecommerce and Economic Nexus
- Director Liable for VAT Fraud and PAYE/NIC on Withdrawals: Ellis & Anor v HMRC (2026)
- UK VAT Gap Rises to £11.9bn in 2024–25, HMRC Reports 6.5% Shortfall
- Luzha v HMRC: VAT Late Submission Penalties Upheld, No Reasonable Excuse Found, Appeal Dismissed














