- The right to deduct input tax under § 15 para. 1 sentence 1 no. 1 UStG does not necessarily correlate with the corresponding VAT due, except for down payments.
- In cases where the service provider calculates VAT based on received consideration according to § 20 UStG, this can lead to a situation where input tax deduction arises without an obligation to pay VAT on the part of the service provider.
- A discrepancy between the emergence of VAT and the input tax claim was exploited by an entrepreneur in a business group as a free financing vehicle.
- The Federal Fiscal Court (BFH) addressed the question in a judgment of 12.7.2023
- XI R 5/21 regarding the behavior of a plaintiff who claimed input tax deductions from service relationships within a business group over several years, where the providers taxed their sales based on received consideration and made mutual payments with some delay.
Source: datenbank.nwb.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- German MOF Issues Second Guidance on Mandatory Domestic B2B E-Invoicing and Error Clarifications
- Federal Ministry of Finance Clarifies B2B E-Invoicing Validation and Mandatory Invoice Elements for 2025
- Second BMF Letter on E-Invoicing: Key Changes and Validation Duties for Businesses Explained
- Analysis of ECJ-cases on VAT for Ancillary Services in German Accommodation Sector
- Germany: Navigating NACE Code Changes for Foreign VAT Refunds in 2025–2026 Transition Period