The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal rules that the additional VAT assessment was rightly imposed on B bv and that X as director was rightly held liable for it. The recipient makes it plausible that only B bv has entered into legal relationships for the deliveries of the telephones with encryption software and the SIM cards. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation inadmissible.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No rental-plus in case of subletting to conservatory
- Knowledge group: rental of solar roof project does not qualify as rental of immovable property
- Agricultural standards for VAT for private use 2025 in last VAT return 2025
- Annual VAT Corrections in the Netherlands: Understanding the BUA and Private Consumption Rules
- Follow-up Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation: Dutch Senate Finance Committee
