The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal rules that the additional VAT assessment was rightly imposed on B bv and that X as director was rightly held liable for it. The recipient makes it plausible that only B bv has entered into legal relationships for the deliveries of the telephones with encryption software and the SIM cards. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation inadmissible.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Tax Plan 2026: Reduced VAT Rate for Culture, Media, and Sports Retained
- No Reduced VAT Rate for Nightclub Entry Fees with DJ Performances, Court Rules
- Proposed VAT Revision Rules for Renovation Services Starting 2026: Key Changes and Implications
- VAT deduction apartment: business office or home? Ruling on actual use and the principle of equality
- Budget 2026: VAT Rate Reversals, Property Rules & Cross-Border Compliance
