- A-G advises on a preliminary question regarding the defense principle in a customs case.
- The case involves a dispute over the origin of certain goods and the imposition of customs duties.
- The lower court ruled in favor of the taxpayer, finding that the goods had a preferential origin and no duties were owed.
- The higher court disagreed and found that the goods were of Chinese origin, leading to the imposition of duties.
- The case is now before the Supreme Court, with the A-G recommending that one of the arguments raised by the taxpayer be referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling.
- The A-G also recommends that the other arguments raised by both parties be rejected.
- The case has been ongoing since 2012 and has implications for the application of the defense principle in customs cases.
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
