- The taxpayer received invoices from another entrepreneur in 2018, claiming VAT deduction.
- The tax inspector argues that the nature of the agreed services cannot be determined from the invoices.
- The court finds it plausible that the taxpayer contributed to a renovation based on additional information provided.
- The taxpayer claims that the VAT on the invoices was paid by the other entrepreneur’s company, supported by relevant documents.
- The court concludes that the taxpayer was entitled to deduct the VAT invoiced to him.
- There is no evidence that the taxpayer was aware of any tax fraud by the other entrepreneur.
- The imposed additional tax assessments must be reduced.
Source: fiscount.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Are Practice Nurses Eligible for VAT Exemption on Medical Services?
- How to Use OSS VAT for EU E-commerce When Shipping from a Dutch Warehouse
- VAT levy on data for ‘free’ social media services: The Netherlands is waiting for Europe
- The Netherlands: Comprehensive VAT Country Guide (2026)
- Zero VAT Rate Denied: Inadequate KYC and Buffers Lead to Knowledge of VAT Fraud in Metal Trade














