On Sept. 7, the Court of Justice of the EU explained in its Michael Schütte v. Finanzamt Brilon decision how value-added tax that was paid, but not due, can be claimed back from the tax authorities. The CJEU decided that if certain conditions are met, a buyer can claim back incorrectly charged VAT directly from the tax authority.
Source Bloombergtax
See also
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Blog: Belgium’s E-Invoicing Frontier: Domestic Transactions and Non-Residents – A Stumble Ahead for Belgium, and Potentially the Entire EU?
- Comments on ECJ C-544/24 – Nature of Tax Interest: Not a Penalty and Proportionate Even When Elevated
- Comments on ECJ C-603/24 (Stellantis Portugal) – Transfer pricing and VAT: Court confirms in Stellantis that not every true-up constitutes a service
- CJEU Clarifies VAT on Transfer Pricing Adjustments: Distinction Between Price Corrections and Services
- ECJ Rules VAT Adjustment Rights Stay With Original Supplier, Not Transferred by Debt Assignment
