- The presentation of a self-assessment as not subject to TPO interrupts the prescription for ITP and AJD.
- The issue of interest is whether the presentation of a self-assessment interrupts the prescription, regardless of its content and result.
- The Supreme Court declares that the tax exemption or non-subjection determined by the taxpayer does not deprive the self-assessment of its interruptive effects.
- The case in question involves a self-assessment for the Actos Jurídicos Documentados, stating non-subjection due to being subject to VAT.
- The self-assessment interrupts the prescription period for the administration to determine the tax debt.
- The lower court’s decision is incorrect as it did not apply the relevant law, and the administration’s right to liquidate has not prescribed.
- The examination of the subject’s subjection to ITP and the conditions for waiving the VAT exemption is not addressed in this case.
Source: audiconsultores-etlglobal.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
