The qualification of a transaction as a “normal” supply of goods — as such relevant for VAT purposes — or as a transfer of a business or a going concern — out of VAT scope — is still a topic to consider. Over time, a considerable number of case laws on such topic have provided guidelines that have not always been persuasive and sometimes even inconsistent, and that, in many cases, have been influenced by contexts with elements of fraud. Moreover, in the Italian framework, many case laws have been affected both by the civil law rules and by the so-called alternativity rule between VAT and registration tax (i.e., one transaction cannot be subject to both taxes).
Source Baker & McKenzie
Latest Posts in "Belgium"
- Comments on ECJ case C-234/24 (Brose Prievidza):No VAT Exemption for Tooling Without Physical Movement
- Who Must Comply with Belgium’s 2026 eInvoicing Mandate? Scope, Impact, and Preparation Steps
- Belgium’s Mandatory eReporting: The Next Step in Digital VAT Compliance After eInvoicing
- Belgium’s 4-Corner eInvoicing Model: What Businesses Need to Know for 2026 Compliance
- Peppol BIS 3.0: The Key to Belgium’s 2026 B2B eInvoicing Compliance and European Interoperability
