The CESTAT, Chandigarh in M/s. M R Beltings v. Commissioner of Central Excise Rohtak [Excise Appeal No. 57958 of 2013 dated August 25, 2023] set aside the demand order on the ground that the entire demand is barred by limitation since, the department was not able to bring anything on record to show that the assessee has suppressed the material fact in order to evade the payment of duty.
- Facts
- Issue
- Held
Source: www.a2ztaxcorp.com
Latest Posts in "India"
- GST on Mining Lease Royalty: Classification, Applicable Rate, and Reverse Charge Mechanism Clarified
- CESTAT: Software Preloaded in Imported Hardware Includible in Customs Value, No Penalty on Wipro
- GST Compliance for Foreign Currency Invoicing: Key Requirements for Indian Exporters
- US Formally Lifts Russia-Linked 25% Tariff on Indian Imports, Confirms 18% Reciprocal Rate
- Fake GST Invoice Scams Persist Despite Crackdown: Shell Firms, Circular Trading Fuel Tax Evasion
