Question about private use has not yet been answeredIn this case, the appeal was rightly declared admissible, according to the Supreme Court. The question of whether the employees’ commuting qualifies as private use of the car provided was not appropriate for mass objection. The Supreme Court has therefore not answered this question. There is also no answer to that question in the collective decision on the objection. The same applies to the question of whether part of the fixed lease costs should also be allocated to the private use of the cars.
Source: pkfwallast.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Deduction Denied: Insufficient Proof of Taxable Activities by Claimant Entrepreneur
- Online Typing Courses for Primary Students Not Exempt from VAT, Rules Gelderland Court
- Preliminary Questions on VAT Transfer of a Going Concern in Real Estate Transactions in the Netherlands
- VAT and the Purchase of a Holiday Home: Key Points and Practical Example for Entrepreneurs
- Typing Courses for Primary School Pupils Subject to 21% VAT: Qualification as Vocational Training?
