In a case involving a hydraulic fracturing company and whether certain equipment it purchased qualified for Ohio’s sales and use tax exemption as equipment used directly in the production of crude oil and natural gas, the Ohio Supreme Court reversed earlier rulings in the case to hold in the taxpayer’s favor that the equipment qualified for exemption under a broader interpretation of the exemption statute.
Source Deloitte
Latest Posts in "United States"
- US Supreme Court decision on IEEPA tariffs reshapes trade authority and introduces potential refund opportunity
- Montana’s 0% Sales Tax Draws Interest from Major Data Center Companies
- US Supreme Court Limits Presidential Power to Impose Customs Duties Under IEEPA
- US Supreme Court Rules Trump’s IEEPA-Based Tariffs Unlawful; Refunds Possible for Affected Importers
- Sales Tax Does Not Apply to Tax Preparation Fees for Paper Tax Returns in California
