The Court of Appeal of The Hague ruled that X was still a VAT entrepreneur even after 6 January 2016 and that the additional VAT assessment was therefore rightly imposed. There is also no right to a refund of VAT on the basis of art. 29 OB Act 1968, because X does not make it plausible that the claim against D BV is irrecoverable. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation unfounded without further motivation (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source: taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands 2026 Tax Plan: VAT Reversal, Property Rules, and Cross-Border Compliance Changes
- Court Ruling on Customs Debt Liability and Warehouse Regulation Compliance in Noord-Holland Case
- Supreme Court Ruling on VAT Refund Request and Objection Admissibility, September 12, 2025
- Court Denies Zero VAT Rate for Intra-Community Supplies Due to Insufficient Evidence
- Court Ruling on Tax Assessment and EU Defense Rights Principle Compliance
