The Calcutta High Court in M/s. Gargo Traders v. The Joint Commissioner, Commercial Taxes [WPA No. 1009 of 2022 dated June 12, 2023] set aside the order rejecting GST refund claim to the assessee by holding that supplier was registered on common portal when assessee entered into transaction, it was on later date that registration was cancelled from retrospective date and directed the Revenue Department to consider documents submitted by assessee substantiating genuineness of the transaction.
Source: a2ztaxcorp.com
Latest Posts in "India"
- GST Not Applicable on Assignment of Leasehold Rights; Eligible for Refund on Past Payments
- ICAI Releases Revised 2026 Handbook on Cross-Border Transactions, Investments, and International Taxation
- High-Value Transactions Now Automatically Reported to Tax Authorities, Even If Not Disclosed in ITR
- GST Compliance for CFOs: Strategic Risk Mitigation and Operational Efficiency in Indian Enterprises
- Supreme Court: Rooh Afza Classified as Fruit Drink, Attracts Only 4% VAT in UP
