The Court of Arnhem-Leeuwarden ruled that the inspector was right to impose an additional assessment if turnover tax was paid in the wrong period. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation unfounded without further motivation (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT aspects of the 2026-2030 Coalition Agreement
- General Court VAT case T-851/25 (Roenes) – Questions – Transfer of a Totality of Assets: Economic Continuity vs. Supplier Intention
- Zero rate rightly refused due to VAT fraud
- No VAT Deduction Without Proper Evidence: Burden of Proof on Entrepreneur After Late Filing
- Zero VAT Rate Denied Due to Knowledge of UK VAT Fraud in Metal Trade Chain
