In an important decision, the Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of Pinstar Automotive India Private Limited v. Addl. Commissioner CGST & CE, (W.P. No. 8493 of 2023), observed that Goods and Services Tax (‘GST’) laws impose a protective levy on the recipient where the supplier has not paid the taxes to the Government.
Source Yogesh Gaba
Latest Posts in "India"
- India’s E-Invoicing Rules: Scope, Formats, Penalties, and Compliance Under the GST Framework
- Continuous Supply of Services Under GST: Legal Criteria Versus Commercial Practice Explained
- Tripura HC: ITC Cannot Be Denied to Bona Fide Purchaser for Supplier’s Tax Default
- Ready-to-Drink Non-Alcoholic Beverages Like Mojito to Attract 40% GST, Rules WB AAR
- Bombay HC: Assignment of Long-Term Industrial Leasehold Rights Not Taxable as ‘Supply’ Under GST
