In an important decision, the Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of Pinstar Automotive India Private Limited v. Addl. Commissioner CGST & CE, (W.P. No. 8493 of 2023), observed that Goods and Services Tax (‘GST’) laws impose a protective levy on the recipient where the supplier has not paid the taxes to the Government.
Source Yogesh Gaba
Latest Posts in "India"
- VAT Pre-Deposit Refund Must Be Paid in Cash Under GST, Rules Madras High Court
- Karnataka High Court: Limitation for GST Refund Mandatory, Delay Condonable Under Writ Jurisdiction
- Karnataka High Court: GST Refund Limitation Mandatory, Delay Condonable Under Writ Jurisdiction
- GST Refund Limitation is Mandatory, but High Courts Can Condon Delay in Genuine Hardship Cases
- DGFT Tightens Certificates of Origin Rules, Mandates Automated Verification and Authorised Issuance
