The dispute between the ATO and Landcom (the land development authority for the state of New South Wales) concerned:
- Whether Landcom, a government entity subject to GST on a notional basis, was entitled to object to the ATO’s response to its GST private ruling request and to appeal against the ATO’s decision on this objection to the Federal Court (jurisdiction issue); and
- How the GST margin scheme applied to a supply of land comprising multiple freehold interests when supplied by Landcom as a single transaction.
Source – Deloitte
Latest Posts in "Australia"
- ATO Clarifies GST Rules for Power Industry: BPPAs, Gifted Assets, and Agency Arrangements
- Final GST Rules Clarified for Sunscreen Products: Ensure Correct GST Application When Selling
- Australia Enacts Treasury Laws Amendment 2025: New GST Reverse Charge Deduction Rules Effective July 2024
- Australia Passes Bill Amending GST Input Credit and Reverse Charge Deduction Rules
- Guidance Issued on Correct Calculation of Point of Consumption Tax for Betting Providers in NSW
