The Court of Appeal has dismissed Greenspace’s appeal. The Court of Appeal considered that the FTT and UT’s approach to the issue was not correct. The issue was not whether something was ‘for a roof’ or was a roof. The correct approach was simply to ask whether Greenspace was supplying insulation for roofs, using the ordinary meaning of those words.
Source: deloitte.com
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Post-Brexit VAT: Why the EU Accepts Imperfect Export Proof but the UK Demands Perfection
- VAT Input Tax Denial Under Kittel Principle – Appeals Allowed Against HMRC
- SK Metals Ltd v HMRC: VAT Input Tax Deductibility and MTIC Fraud Knowledge
- UK Chancellor Considers VAT Rate Adjustments and Threshold Changes in Upcoming Budget
- Upper Tribunal Rules Cosmetic Treatments by Medical Professionals Can Qualify for VAT Exemption
