The Supreme Court recently ruled in a case in which an auction house auctioned used household goods, art and antiques and the like and charged a fee for this to both the seller (commission) and the buyer (buyer). It follows from this judgment that an auction house owes VAT on both the commissions and the premiums it charges.
Source BTW Instituut
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No Compensation for Late Decision on VAT Refund
- VAT Exemption for STI and HPV Test Kits as Healthcare Services
- Option for VAT-Taxed Rental Invalid Where Part of the Property is Sub-Let VAT-Exempt – No Input VAT Recovery for Tenant
- Hoge Raad Confirms Justified VAT Assessments on Gold Trader (Art. 81 RO) – Failure to File “Required Returns” Reverses Burden of Proof
- VAT Exemption Applies to Self-Test Kits for STIs and HPV Offered by Commercial Provider
