The ECJ issued its judgment on 8 December 2022, finding that the obligation for a lawyer invoking professional privilege to inform other intermediaries involved is not necessary and infringes the right to respect for communications with their client. Considering this, the CJEU ruled that Article 8ab(5) of Council Directive 2011/16/EU, which contains the obligation provision, is invalid in so far as the Member States’ application of that provision has the effect of requiring a lawyer acting as an intermediary to notify any other intermediary, who is not their client, of that other intermediary’s reporting obligations.
Source Orbitax
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-603/24 (Stellantis Portugal) – Transfer pricing and VAT: Court confirms in Stellantis that not every true-up constitutes a service
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 3 Judgments till June 25, 2026
- EGC VAT Case T-231/26 (Agenzia delle Entrate Direzione Provinciale Genoval) – Questions – VAT deductibility of general expenses for auctioneers under margin scheme
- EGC VAT Case T-232/26 (Appellant_1 Srl ) – Questions – VAT deductibility of general expenses for auctioneers under margin scheme
- CJEU Rules on VAT Treatment of Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Stellantis Portugal Case
