The Dutch Supreme Court ruled that only changes in the structural construction (bouwkundige constructie) of an existing building can lead to the conclusion that a refurbishment was so significant that essentially a new building is constructed. In this blog post Ashley Peeters and Johan Vrolijk describe the ruling of the Dutch Supreme Court, why the Dutch real estate market was looking forward to this ruling and the implications thereof.
Source: stibbe.com
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Referral in case deduction of input VAT market-maker
- No Penalty for VAT Evasion Aimed at Another EU Member State, Supreme Court Rules
- No Penalty for VAT Fraud in Other EU State Without Intent to Evade Dutch VAT
- No Penalty for VAT Fraud Involving Other EU States, Supreme Court Rules Under Article 67f AWR
- VAT Deduction for Home Office Possible, Even with Limited Private Use: Court Ruling Explained
