The Dutch Supreme Court ruled that only changes in the structural construction (bouwkundige constructie) of an existing building can lead to the conclusion that a refurbishment was so significant that essentially a new building is constructed. In this blog post Ashley Peeters and Johan Vrolijk describe the ruling of the Dutch Supreme Court, why the Dutch real estate market was looking forward to this ruling and the implications thereof.
Source: stibbe.com
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Deduction Denied Without Invoices in Zeeland-West-Brabant Tax Case
- Ledger cards insufficient for input VAT deduction
- Court Affirms Non-Deductibility of Input VAT on Catering and Other Non-Business Costs
- VAT Deduction Correction on Unbusinesslike Costs Mostly Upheld
- VAT Deduction Denied for Unproven Invoiced Services
