What the EU Gets Wrong About “Tax Fairness” and How Principled Tax Policy Can Help
Another example is value-added tax carveouts for certain products. The EU Parliament believes reduced rates on essential goods will “benefit low-income households and, as such, tackle the regressiveness of the VAT system,” as well as mitigate future exceptional circumstances like pandemics, humanitarian crises, or natural disasters.
However, recent research shows that reduced rates and exemptions are not an effective way of supporting low-income households and could even increase the regressivity of the system if, to achieve revenue goals, the general VAT rates are increased. In other words, these carveouts make the EU’s VAT system less equitable.
Source Tax Foundation
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU VAT Tax Gaps 2023: Compliance, Policy Gaps, and Member State Comparisons
- CJEU Expands VAT Exemption Scope for Credit Intermediaries, Clarifies Criteria for Eligibility
- Czech Republic, Greece, Slovakia Face Action Over Delays in Customs Import and Storage Systems
- EU Issues Reasoned Opinions to Five States Over Incomplete Customs Data Transmission via SURV3 System
- ICS2 Mandatory for Entry Summary Declarations from January 2026 for GB, NI, and EU Shipments













