What the EU Gets Wrong About “Tax Fairness” and How Principled Tax Policy Can Help
Another example is value-added tax carveouts for certain products. The EU Parliament believes reduced rates on essential goods will “benefit low-income households and, as such, tackle the regressiveness of the VAT system,” as well as mitigate future exceptional circumstances like pandemics, humanitarian crises, or natural disasters.
However, recent research shows that reduced rates and exemptions are not an effective way of supporting low-income households and could even increase the regressivity of the system if, to achieve revenue goals, the general VAT rates are increased. In other words, these carveouts make the EU’s VAT system less equitable.
Source Tax Foundation
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- VAT Treatment of Loyalty Points: Are Issued Points Considered Vouchers Under EU Law?
- Will the ECJ Review the EuG’s Landmark Ruling on Input VAT Deduction Timing?
- EPPO Raids in Germany Over Suspected €1.6 Million Aluminium Customs Fraud from China
- Late Invoices for Intra-Community Acquisitions: VAT Deduction Allowed When Claimed Upon Receipt
- CJEU Rules Video Game Virtual Currency Not Exempt from VAT, Not a Multi-Purpose Voucher
