SRN states initially that it is a question of a chain transaction, i.e. that the electricity must be considered transferred in two stages – first from the operator to the Applicant and then from the Applicant to the customer. The applicant therefore sells a product.
Furthermore, according to SRN, it is a composite provision where electricity is the main part that the customer requests. This is because the service is not something that the customer can be considered to have requested separately, but only a means to be able to charge the car.
SRN’s conclusion is thus that the Applicant is selling a composite provision of a product.
Source: svalner.se
Latest Posts in "Sweden"
- New ECG Case T-96/26 (TellusTax Advisory) – No details known yet
- Sweden Proposes Major 2027 VAT Reforms Affecting OSS, E-Commerce, and Platform Liability
- Clarification on Amendment Invoices: Requirements When Buyer Is Known and Tax Loss Risk Exists
- No Amended Invoice Needed if Seller Proves Buyer Is a Private Individual Without Deduction Rights
- Sweden Proposes VAT Amendments for Cross-Border Trade, Aligning with EU Digital Age Rules
