Advocate General Ettema concludes that there is no disbursement. X bv owes the levy itself.
X bv operates various forest parks, chalet parks and campsites. In addition to the rent for the chalets it receives, X bv also receives a contribution from park holidaymakers who own a chalet. X bv will charge both the tenants and the owners € 1.25 per m³ of water in connection with the purification levy charged to it. It is in dispute whether VAT should be calculated on the amount of sewage treatment levy charged on.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Despite major renovation of the hotel, there is no question of essentially new construction
- Partial VAT Deduction for Home Construction with Integrated Solar Panels Based on Actual Use
- Supreme Court Overturns VAT Penalty Ruling: Key Inspector’s Argument Ignored, Case Referred Back
- New General Court VAT case T-851/25 (Roenes) – No details known yet
- Dutch Tax Authority Loses €1.5 Billion to Vanishing Entrepreneurs via Turbo Liquidations
