The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled that X did not provide the medical services in its own name. It does not follow from the documents submitted by X that it carries out the observations in its own name. The inspector therefore rightly imposed the additional VAT assessment on X.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Response to Follow-up Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation Sector, March 2026
- Fuel Retailers Urge Tax Cuts as Pump Prices Soar, Warn Tanken Becoming Unaffordable
- Brokerage Fees Only Partially Deductible Due to Link with Agricultural Exemption, Court Rules
- Dutch Tax Authority Switching to Rabobank Account Numbers from May 1, 2026: What to Know
- Despite the absence of a tax representative, the application of the zero rate
