The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled that X did not provide the medical services in its own name. It does not follow from the documents submitted by X that it carries out the observations in its own name. The inspector therefore rightly imposed the additional VAT assessment on X.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands 2026 Tax Plan: VAT Reversal, Property Rules, and Cross-Border Compliance Changes
- Court Ruling on Customs Debt Liability and Warehouse Regulation Compliance in Noord-Holland Case
- Supreme Court Ruling on VAT Refund Request and Objection Admissibility, September 12, 2025
- Court Denies Zero VAT Rate for Intra-Community Supplies Due to Insufficient Evidence
- Court Ruling on Tax Assessment and EU Defense Rights Principle Compliance
