Advocate General Kokott concludes that P GmbH is not liable for VAT if its customers are not entitled to deduct input tax. Insofar as there are VAT taxpayers among the visitors to the playground, a tax debt does arise.
P GmbH operates an indoor playground. Although the entrance fees for the indoor playground are subject to the reduced VAT rate of 13%, P GmbH applies the normal VAT rate of 20%. P GmbH requests a refund of the excess VAT paid. According to the Austrian tax authorities, however, there is no right to a refund. The Austrian court is asking questions for a preliminary ruling in this case.
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-101/24 (Xyrality) – Judgment on app stores as VAT commissionaires
- ECJ Confirms Deemed Reseller Rule for App Store In-App Purchases
- VAT Challenges in Toll Manufacturing: Goods vs Services Classification Issues
- VAT and Transfer Pricing – Four recent cases @ ECJ/CJEU – 3 cases decided, 1 case pending
- Briefing document & Podcast: ECJ C-580/16 (Hans Bühler) – Late submission of recapitulative statements should not disqualify a business from exemptions
