The Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) ruled on 7 April 2022 in the long-awaited Berlin Chemie case (C-333/20) that a company which has its registered office in one Member State does not have a fixed establishment for VAT purposes in another Member State on the ground that that company owns a subsidiary in another Member State that makes available to it human and technical resources under contracts by means of which that subsidiary provides, exclusively to it, marketing, regulatory, advertising and representation services that are capable of having a direct influence on the volume of its sales.
Source Linklaters
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Do Loyalty Program Points Qualify as Vouchers? CJEU to Decide on VAT Implications
- EU Advocate General: Loyalty Points Not Free for VAT Purposes in Lyko Case
- Court Rules Sudoku Books as Periodicals: Implications for VAT and Tariff Classification
- EU Directive 2025/1539 Enhances IOSS for Improved VAT Compliance and Fair Competition
- ECJ Advocate General: VAT Applies to Lithuanian In-Game Currency Resale Profits
