European case law has repeatedly examined the concept of a “passive” fixed establishment in an attempt to determine its contours. The judgment commented on here adds to the debate:
- For a fixed establishment to exist, it is not necessary to have human or technical resources of one’s own. If these human or technical resources belong to a third party, it is necessary that the company has the power to use these resources as if they were its own.
- The same means cannot be used both to provide as well as to receive the same services
The sales representation and marketing services provided by the Romanian company are received by the German company, which then uses its own human and technical resources located in Germany to conclude and execute sales contracts with distributors of its products in Romania. Therefore, the German company does not have a permanent establishment in Romania.
Source vatdesk.eu
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU Pushes VAT Cuts to Accelerate Electrification
- Financial-Sector VAT, “Beyond ViDA” and Implementation: Inside the Joint GFV/VEG Minutes of 25 June 2026
- EU Annual Report on Taxation 2026: VAT Holds Firm as Consumption Taxes Cede Ground to Capital
- ECJ State Aid C-360/25 (X) – Judgment – National VAT Exemption Without Directive Basis Constitutes Unlawful State Aid
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on “Liability to pay VAT – VAT shall be payable by any person who enters the VAT on an invoice” (Art. 203)
