The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court rules that X bv is not entitled to deduct the VAT stated in the notarial deed. The witness statements show that X bv, director I and the civil-law notary have set up a construction to obtain a tax advantage fraudulently. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation without further motivation unfounded (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands 2026 Tax Plan: Overview of Major VAT Changes
- Tax Plan 2026: Reduced VAT Rate for Culture, Media, and Sports Retained
- No Reduced VAT Rate for Nightclub Entry Fees with DJ Performances, Court Rules
- Proposed VAT Revision Rules for Renovation Services Starting 2026: Key Changes and Implications
- VAT deduction apartment: business office or home? Ruling on actual use and the principle of equality
