The inspector rejected the refund claim because, in his view, the purchase of the nickel was not related to X’s business activities. The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court ruled that the management of the working capital was necessary for business operations and without that management the economic activity could not be carried on or continued. Thus, there was a direct and immediate link with X’s economic activity as a whole. X had implemented the working capital management by purchasing a batch of nickel. The fact that the purchase was not necessary as such did not mean that there was no direct and immediate connection. It concerned a business decision about how X implemented working capital management.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Reduced VAT Rate for Open Access Publication Rights: Single or Separate Service from Reading Rights?
- Dutch Government Under Pressure to Act as Fuel Prices Soar Amid Middle East Conflict
- Amsterdam Court Convicts Director for Tax Fraud and Non-Cooperation, Imposes Community Service and Suspended SentencePoland
- ViDA E‑Invoicing and Digital Reporting in the Netherlands: Strategic Choices and Phased Timeline to 2032
- Netherlands announces changes to non-EU VAT refund scheme as of 1 April 2026














