A fine distinction is often required to be made to establish the correct VAT treatment of a supply. In this case a degree of semantics was required to determine whether the panels were energy-saving materials (even when they certainly saved energy). On such small things turned the assessment of £2.6 million here. It always pays to double check VAT treatments rather than making assumptions.
Source: marcusward.co
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- SAP Selected by HMRC to Lead Major Technology Transformation of the UK Tax System
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Recovery Rules for Corporate Groups After Hotel La Tour Decision
- Appeal Dismissed: Input VAT Denial and Personal Liability Upheld on Kittel Grounds for One Call Consultants
- Input VAT Denial Upheld: Kittel Assessment and Penalties Made Within Statutory Time Limit
- Boehringer Ruling: Could £2.5bn VAT Reclaims Transform UK Pharma and Healthcare Forever?
