In Byrne v Revenue Commissioners, the High Court upheld a Tax Appeals Commission (“TAC“) finding that a taxpayer (Mr. Byrne) should have known that there was a VAT fraud in the supply chain on the purchase of fuel for his filling stations. Mr. Byrne could not therefore set off the VAT paid by him for the fuel supplies. Mr. Byrne had appealed the TAC finding to the High Court by a case stated, which Revenue successfully contested. On the basis that Revenue had won, Revenue claimed its costs for the Court case against Mr. Byrne. However, the Court reduced the legal costs awarded to Revenue to 60% on the basis that Revenue had ‘thrown the kitchen sink‘ at the case, including two tenuous and unreasonable arguments.
Source: Mondaq
Latest Posts in "Ireland"
- Irish VAT Grouping Rules 2025: Key Changes, EU Alignment, and Impact on Cross-Border Businesses
- Ireland Introduces Variable Direct Debit for VAT Payments, Replacing Fixed Direct Debit from August 2025
- Irish Revenue Restricts VAT Groups to Irish Establishments Only: Key Changes Effective November 2025
- Revised PEM Rules of Origin to Apply Exclusively from 1 January 2026
- Ireland Sets Phased Timeline for Mandatory B2B E-Invoicing and Real-Time VAT Reporting
