The judgment ECJ C-80/20 illustrates the dilemma between the EU law general principles and some particularities of VAT. Faced with the denial of a deduction, it is not strange to hear the argument of “no problem, a corrective invoice can be issued and deducted later, it is not necessary to appeal.” However, that is easier said then done…
Source Francisco Javier Sánchez Gallardo (pdf file)
See also
- ECJ C-80/20 (Wilo Salmson France) – Decision – Cancellation and reissuance of invoice does not change period for which VAT refund can be requested
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Right to Deduct VAT and ”Substance over form” concept
Join our Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Reevaluating EDIFACT Exclusion in B2B E-Invoicing under ViDA
- CJEU Rules Loyalty Points Are Not Vouchers for VAT Purposes, Treated as Discounts Instead
- CJEU Rules In-Game Gold Sales Subject to VAT, Not Exempt as Currency or Voucher
- Comments on ECJ C-472/24: Court Rules Virtual Gold Not Exempt from VAT
- Comments on ECJ C-436/24 (Lyko): Court Rules Loyalty Points Do Not Qualify as Vouchers
