The judgment ECJ C-80/20 illustrates the dilemma between the EU law general principles and some particularities of VAT. Faced with the denial of a deduction, it is not strange to hear the argument of “no problem, a corrective invoice can be issued and deducted later, it is not necessary to appeal.” However, that is easier said then done…
Source Francisco Javier Sánchez Gallardo (pdf file)
See also
- ECJ C-80/20 (Wilo Salmson France) – Decision – Cancellation and reissuance of invoice does not change period for which VAT refund can be requested
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Right to Deduct VAT and ”Substance over form” concept
Join our Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-472/24: AG Opinion on Taxation of Virtual Gold in Online Gaming
- Briefing document & Podcast: ECJ C-564/15 (Farkas) – Non-application Reverse-Charge, 50% tax penalty is disproportionate
- Pierrakakis at ECOFIN: Innovation and Digitalization as Europe’s Competitiveness Drivers
- Three Plead Guilty in €6.5 Million Tax Evasion and Money Laundering Case
- Transfer Pricing Adjustments and VAT Implications: Impact of Recent CJEU Decisions
