In its recent ruling, the Supreme Administrative Court ruled in favour of a taxpayer in a case of an alleged VAT fraud where no outstanding tax existed at the time of the decision. In the heard case, the tax administration challenged the taxpayer’s excessive VAT deduction, arguing that the taxpayer participated in a chain of transactions affected by fraudulent conduct. The taxpayrer defended itself against the conclusions of the tax administrator and appellate body by administrative action and a cassation complaint.
Source: Deloitte
Latest Posts in "Czech Republic"
- EET 2.0: New Cash Register Rules, Exemptions, and Benefits for Businesses and Employees from 2027
- VAT Rules for Real Estate Sales: Substantial Changes, Social Housing, and Taxation Options Explained
- EGC VAT T-53/26 (Central Europe Mark) – Questions – Examination of Tax Neutrality and Proportionality in Securing VAT Payments Without Interest Compensation
- VAT Deduction Cannot Be Claimed Retroactively via Additional Tax Return Without Tax Document
- Czech Republic Plans EET 2.0, VAT Cuts, and Tax Exemptions for Hospitality Sector from 2027














