In its recent ruling, the Supreme Administrative Court ruled in favour of a taxpayer in a case of an alleged VAT fraud where no outstanding tax existed at the time of the decision. In the heard case, the tax administration challenged the taxpayer’s excessive VAT deduction, arguing that the taxpayer participated in a chain of transactions affected by fraudulent conduct. The taxpayrer defended itself against the conclusions of the tax administrator and appellate body by administrative action and a cassation complaint.
Source: Deloitte
Latest Posts in "Czech Republic"
- Draft Amendment to VAT Act Targets Bad Debts, Unpaid Liabilities, and Non-Alcoholic Beverage Tax Rates
- How to Register and Record Sales Using EET 2.0: Steps for Retailers and Entrepreneurs
- Ministry of Finance Submits Draft VAT Act Amendment to Transpose ViDA Rules
- EU Court: VAT Deduction Pro Rata Excluded if Equipment Used Only for Exempt Activities
- Draft EET 2.0 Amendment Introduces Earlier VAT Corrections for Bad Debts and Expands Reduced VAT Rate for Catering














