The Hague Court, like the District Court, ruled that X is not hindered in its right to free establishment, which it derives from Article 49 TFEU, by the territorial effect of Art. 11 of the VAT Directive. In this context, the Court of Appeal discusses the judgment of the CJEU of 11 March 2021, UN 2021/13.15 (Danske Bank). In the judgment, the CJEU explicitly considers that a Member State is not permitted to include persons established outside its own territory as part of a fiscal unity. X’s appeal is unfounded.
Source: taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Rules for Installing and Leasing Non-Integrated Solar Panels: Tax Authority Clarifies
- Holding and Subsidiary Form VAT Fiscal Unity Due to Financial and Organizational Interdependence
- BVs managed by one person with non-negligible economic ties, therefore Fixed Establishment for VAT purposes
- Abuse of litigation through the use of AI: reimbursement of full legal costs
- The use of practice assistants at general practitioners’ practices qualifies as VAT-exempt care
