According to the Supreme Court, the questions of the District Court did not lend themselves to an answer by way of a preliminary ruling. According to the Supreme Court, in this case there was no reason to deviate from the premise that a party was allowed to submit everything at its disposal as evidence.
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court: VAT Refund on Unpaid Mobile Phone Installments
- VAT-Exempt Rental of Squash and Padel Courts
- You’re Still Responsible for VAT Fraud After Hiring an Accountant
- Advocate General Advises EU Court Referral on VAT for Pension Contributions
- NOB Criticizes New ViDA VAT Rules for Unnecessary Complexity and Implementation Delays
