High Court directed to decide the matter by way of a reasoned order where the electronic credit ledger was blocked citing a mismatch in the Input Tax Credit claimed in GSTR-3B and that appearing in GSTR-2A.
High COurt held that writ petition is directed to be treated as a representation to Assistant Commissioner Palam Division CGST Delhi South, who is directed to decide the same by way of a reasoned order within four weeks, in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and/or its authorized representative. Till the said representation is decided by Assistant Commissioner Palam Division CGST Delhi South, the parties are directed to maintain status quo with regard to the impugned notice dated 28th January, 2020.
Source Taxguru
Latest Posts in "India"
- CBIC Clarifies GST Implications on Secondary or Post-Sale Discounts for Businesses
- India Slashes GST on Drones to 5%, Boosting Domestic Manufacturing and Sectoral Growth
- GST Reforms 2025: Boosting Textiles, Apparel Affordability, and Logistics Efficiency in India
- GST Credit Notes: Use Original Invoice Rate for Returned Goods, Not Revised Rate
- India Cuts GST on Renewable Energy to 5%, Boosting Solar Affordability and Green Jobs
