The Maharashtra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling while confirming the order of the Maharashtra Advance Ruling Authority held that the contract in the impugned case is though a composite supply not for immovable property, and therefore does not fall under the definition of ‘works contract’. The principal supply in the case is of Air conditioning units and the entire contract is taxable @ 28%.
Source Taxguru
Latest Posts in "India"
- Himachal Pradesh Assembly Approves VAT Bill, Permits Up to ₹5 Cess on Petrol, Diesel
- Karnataka AAR Allows ITC on Ancillary Expenses for Used Vehicles Sold Under Margin Scheme
- ISD Credit Distribution Allowed Only After ITC Eligibility Under Section 16, Rules Madras High Court
- Hookah Served in Restaurants Not Restaurant Service, Taxed Separately: West Bengal AAR Rules
- Key Changes in RBI’s FEMA Export and Import Regulations, 2026: Integrated Rules and Reporting Updates
