AG Opinion
Having regard to the foregoing considerations, I propose that the Court should reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) as follows:
Article 135(1)(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that a single supply of management services, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which is provided by an IT platform belonging to a third-party provider to a fund management company and includes both special investment funds and other funds, does not fall within the scope of the exemption laid down in that provision.
Sources:
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ VAT C-409/24 to C-411/24 – Judgment – Reduced VAT Rate Excludes Non-Accommodation Ancillary Services
- ECJ C-436/24 (Lyko Operations) – Judgment – Loyalty Points in Customer Reward Schemes Are Not VAT Vouchers
- ECJ C-472/24 (Žaidimų valiuta) – Judgment – VAT Exemption Denied for Virtual Money Transactions
- ECG T-96/26 (TellusTax Advisory) – Questions – VAT deductions in the event of different VAT treatment between Member States
- VIDA Measures applicable from 1 January 2027
