Before the Supreme Court case South Dakota v. Wayfair was even a glimmer in a tax collector’s eye, states and a diverse array of special interests spent decades agitating for greater cross-border tax authority. In the process, there were grandiose claims that tens of billions of dollars in taxes were going uncollected. Thus, allowing states to collect tax on remote sales made by businesses with no physical presence in their borders was supposed to allow them to generate huge new streams of revenue to patch state budgets. Reality hasn’t come close to matching this revenue dream.
Source: ntu.org
Latest Posts in "United States"
- Norway’s EV Revolution: What Happens When Electric Cars Dominate and Incentives Fade
- The Supreme Court’s IEEPA tariffs ruling is coming
- California Faces New Wave of Local Sales Tax Hikes Amid Legal Loopholes and Voter Confusion
- New Hampshire Launches Tax Amnesty Program Covering Multiple Tax Types, Waives Penalties and Reduces Interest
- Nevada Moves Sales and Use Tax Return Due Date to the 20th of Each Month
