Following the Astra Zeneca case in which employees sacrificed salary in exchange for vouchers, HMRC took the view that there was a supply of services on which VAT was due.
The Upper Tribunal in the case of Pertemps has now concluded that the there is no supply of services, nor an economic activity in the situation where an employee of Pertemps sacrifices salary under what was known as a Mobile Advantage Plan (MAP) under which they received travel and subsistence expenses for a reduced salary.
Source: haysmacintyre.com
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Recovery Rules for Corporate Groups After Hotel La Tour Decision
- Appeal Dismissed: Input VAT Denial and Personal Liability Upheld on Kittel Grounds for One Call Consultants
- Input VAT Denial Upheld: Kittel Assessment and Penalties Made Within Statutory Time Limit
- Boehringer Ruling: Could £2.5bn VAT Reclaims Transform UK Pharma and Healthcare Forever?
- VAT Recovery Possible Without Fully Compliant Invoices if Alternative Evidence Provided, UK Tribunal Rules
